Joseph Heled wrote:
> In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in the
> past it took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining this? Is there
> a way to get the histogram for just the selection?
Carol wrote:
> it is easy enough to make a new layer of the selection and work the
> histogram bearing tools on this.
Doesn't work unless the selection is rectangular: all of the transparent
pixels contribute to the histogram.
(The histogram in the Levels tool does take the selection into account,
by the way, but it does not show statistics.)
Best,
-- Bill
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu
