Selon Tor Lillqvist <tml@xxxxxx>: > Hmm, do you maybe mean effective and not efficient? > > Also, the result has an eerie "artistic" or "oilpaintingish" look to > it. But I am sure all denoising algorithms always have some artefacts. Yes, it's true that those algorithms are quite slow, even on fast machine. Moreover, denoising part often requires some tests before having acceptable results (which is somewhat subjective). Fine-tuning parameters on slow machines is really painful (some may say unusable). I'm for instance focussed on inpainting removal, since it gives rather good results, and it's simple to use. Regards, -- Thierry Pierron
