Re: [Gimp-developer] Newly added plug-ins - "artistic"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

"Joao S. O. Bueno" <gwidion@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I just tried the new photocopy, cartoon and softglow plug-ins, and 
> IMHO, when compared to similiar ones, the correct colocation of them 
> would not be in the "artistic" category. They'd better fall under 
> "distorts", maybe with softglow going into "Light Effects"

Artistic is perhaps not the right place (at least for Photocopy and
Softglow, it makes a lot of sense for Cartoon) but why would you want
to put them to Distorts? These plug-ins do not distort the pixels at
all.


Sven

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux