On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 19:19, Markus Triska wrote: > I have explained this above - re-define "set!" to use the TinyScheme > "defined?" command to see if a variable is already defined, and if this is > not the case, define it. Now I understand what you were getting at earlier. That would work only I don't see defined? as being available in the R5RS. However, a check of the interpreter indicates it does have such a function so this should be doable even if it is outside the current standard (perhaps its in of the suggested additions and will be part of R6RS currently being developed). I think I may be able to use that to deal with the missing symbol-bound? function of SIOD. -- Cheers! Kevin. (http://www.interlog.com/~kcozens/) Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 |"What are we going to do today, Borg?" E-mail:kcozens at interlog dot com|"Same thing we always do, Pinkutus: Packet:ve3syb@ve3yra.#con.on.ca.na| Try to assimilate the world!" #include <disclaimer/favourite> | -Pinkutus & the Borg
