GSR - FR wrote:
> Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
> calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix?
The main reason not to use convmatrix is that internally it always
does a 5x5 convolution, regardless of the matrix entries. This means
it should take almost three times as long as the 3x3 convolution in
blur.c; in fact, a little testing on a 5000 x 10000 image shows it
taking over four times as long. Otherwise using convmatrix would
probably be the right solution.
Best,
-- Bill
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu
