Salute again, On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > I just sent a mail to a gimp.org alias, and it bounced with the > following problem: > > >This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). > > > >A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > >recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > > > 01079@xxxxxxxxxx > > (generated from brix@xxxxxxxx) > > SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<01079@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > host mail1.iha.dk [130.225.184.39]: 554 Service unavailable; Client > > host [128.32.112.247] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see > > http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?128.32.112.247 > > 128.32.112.247 is shill.xcf.berkeley.edu, which is presumably some kind > of gateway for gimp.org mail. So getting onto spamcop's blacklist > probably means that gimp.org mails aren't going to be too reliable for a > while. > > Does anyone know what's wrong with beta.gimp.org at the moment? It's > mostly down, but it was up for a while yesterday evening. > great. what does this mean about seemingly good information about cvs versions coming from gimp.org addresses? carol
