Hi, "William Skaggs" <weskaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > 1) When the jpeg loader finds EXIF data, it creates a parasite > called "jpeg-exif-data". EXIF data is not specific to jpeg files, > though, and having differently named parasites for "tiff-exif-data", > etc, makes things unnecessarily difficult, as far as I can see. Can > this be renamed as simply "exif-data"? Is this data really exchangeable between file formats? If so then this should probably be changed. > 2) If libexif is available, then the jpeg loader creates a > jpeg-exif-data parasite regardless of whether the file actually > contains exif data; if not, the parasite is just a bare header. > Would it be preferable to not create a parasite in this case? That sounds like the right thing to do. Sven
