Hi, Dave Neary <dneary@xxxxxxx> writes: > I think that if it's done, and works correctly, and is useful, we > should use it. Useful for what? What do you think libpdb is? We don't need to replace our working PDB code with other code that does the same thing. Unless I am completely wrong, what we are talking about here is a redesign of the way that plug-ins talk with the GIMP core. That's something that should be well done and it absolutely needs a stable API that isn't changed with the next release. Otherwise noone will ever port their plug-ins to it. > The PDB redesign is vaporware, and might not even be done before > gegl gets integrated. If libpdb helps in the meantime, I'm all for it. Helps for what? If libpdb is not our PDB redesign, what is it then? Sven
