Hi, Robert L Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > One comment I've seen reading through various OS X forums about > Gimp-Print is that the packaging is important. An experienced Mac > person built an OS X package for us that runs a traditional OS X > installer, and people appreciate not being forced to use the command > line. Even having to type "ports install gimp" -- or more likely > "sudo ports install gimp" -- will turn off the hardened Macintosh user > community. These folks are even more command-line averse than Windows > users. I hadn't this impression but most probably I don't know the typical Mac user... One good thing about the Darwin ports system is that it's trivial to build a DMG image from a port. So if we get gimp-2.0 into the ports system we instantly have a way to build a full-featured Mac OS X installer from it. Sven
