Perhaps we need a browser function for accessing a remote site with installable plug-ins, just like the "extensions" and plug-ins available in MozillaFirebird. It might also be coupled with an "update" function that retrieves the latest version of all installed plug-ins. Regards, Dov On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:39:32AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:34:48PM +0200, Dov Grobgeld <dov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sven wanted to have a discussion whether this plug-in should be included > > If discussion means "wants to see some opinions", then here we go :) > > - No, it should not be included, in general. > - As long as there is no good repository for plug-ins (and my opinion is > that there isn't), it (and any other plug-ins that can be maintained > at reasonable cost(!)) should be included, as that's the best way to > ensure total user satisfaction. > > In other words: Right now, yes, but in the long run it should be a > seperately installable module, just as python or perl come with some > common modules/extensions, but not all of them. > > -- > -----==- | > ----==-- _ | > ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- > --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxx |e| > -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ > The choice of a GNU generation | > | > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-developer mailing list > Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
