On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 12:32:28 +0200, Michael Natterer <mitch@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Raphaël Quinet <quinet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > we are planning for > > 1.3.21 soon (not ready for 2.0rc1 yet) > > We cannot make a 2.0 release candidate until libgimp is API frozen. > Apart from that, current CVS is more stable and more consistent than > it was at the time we released 1.2, so actually we could release 2.0 > at any time. Yes, both of these are good points. > > and the web site hasn't been > > moved. > > You know my opinion about this. [...] > I totally agree and still wonder why we still have that old website. > While we have good reasons to delay 2.0 release candidates, I fail > to see a single reason for further web site moving delays. Yes. The site should move as soon as possible. The remaining problems with the new site have been fixed more than a week ago, and the gimp-web team has been waiting since then for the site to be moved. > > I suggest to create that branch immediately after the 1.3.21 release. > > What do you think? > > No. OK. It makes more sense to create that branch once 2.0 is released. I just wanted to know what you would think about creating a branch earlier. While this could be a good idea for a larger project with more resources, this seems to be a stupid idea of the GIMP. Thanks for your feedback. ;-) -Raphaël
