dneary@xxxxxxx (2003-09-25 at 2008.02 +0200): > You have a point here. I think that what was chosen was the > consistency of Shift as negation. I think that's probably a goal Relation, not just plain negation. So that is why using shift for grouping would be fine. > we could work towards. It certainly makes a lot of logical sense. > But then, so does having + to zoom in instead of =, and look how > many bug reports that's got us :) I thought the logic behind = for zoom is that it is in the same key than + (in USA kbds, at least) but people wanted to avoid using Shift. I guess people's logic includes comfort. :] GSR
