Hi, Daniel Egger <degger@xxxxxxx> writes: > That's exactly my point. Sorry to be negative here but I have the very > strong feeling that we will not get gimp-help-2 into adequate shape > until the projected date of release of GIMP 2.0 and as such it doesn't > make a whole lot of sense to me to bend over trying to somehow get the > transformation and the help-browser in place because it's a waste of > precious time when not knowing that it'll be used for a longer period of > time. I think we could get the framework done for 2.0 and fill in the content when 2.0 is out. The help files are supposed to be distributed separately anway so I don't see the long period of time you are speaking of. > The explanation I proviced about displaying HTML instead of DocBook > directly (still just for the online help!) should show why this an > inferior solution. I've a few more points in case someone wants to > discuss it over, but for me there's no point in supporting a quick > hack instead of a proper long term solution which the HTML one > simply cannot be, at least not in this form, and I haven't heard of > a better one yet. I tried to outline one. Should I try to explain it again? Sven
