I am getting a little confused by some of the statements made in this and earlier threads. What it comes down to, I guess, is that Daniel and Mel had a clear vision of the style of the new user documentation, but I somehow missed an explanation of that vision. In an earlier thread, Daniel wrote: "we're not too happy with the content and the structure of the GUMP". I take it you meant the GIMP documentation? Why are you not too happy about the content and the structure? You also talked about granularity. Apparently, part of your idea of a GIMP documentation style is that help pages should be of similar size. Could you elaborate about that? Is that what you mean with granularity? >From what I understand, you want to give authors for a certain language a certain freedom of what and how much they write on any given topic. Doesn't this collide with your goal of having a set size grain? -- branko collin collin@xxxxxxxxx
