On 19 July, 2003 - Patrick McFarland sent me these 1,1K bytes: > On 19-Jul-2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > > We might do another 1.2 release but I doubt that this will happen and > > it would surely be just be a bug-fix release with no new feature > > whatsoever. GIMP-1.3 is close to being released as 2.0 and support for > > 1.2 will be dropped then. > > Releasing the stable from 1.3 is a bad idea, and I think everyone knows it. > I wrote an email a few minutes before this one, and I suggest you read it. > > 1.3 should become 1.4. It doesnt use gegl, and it isnt 2.0 material. Releasing > 1.3 as 2.0 is possibly the worse thing any of you could ever do. You know those > slashdot trolls who keep saying apple and bsd are dead? They'll say gimp is > dead, and I will believe them. A new version with heaps of changes is released.. that means gimp is dead? I don't follow. /Tomas -- Tomas Ögren, stric@xxxxxxxxxx, http://www.ing.umu.se/~stric/ |- Student at Computing Science, University of Umeå `- Sysadmin at {cs,ing,acc}.umu.se
