Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit David Neary <dneary@xxxxxxx> > > There is even an argument for having them always-on, and turning > > off that option. The option is always available not to use them, > > after all :) > > That would be really bad. When doing graphics work (and every other > kind of computing, IMHO), screen real estate is a precious resource, > in particular *vertical* real estate, as that is the direction in > which most monitors are smallest. My monitor can show me 1024 rows of > pixels at a time; I'd deeply resent a program that insisted on wasting > any of them on a menu bar. Fair enough. As an option it is, then. Any opposition to having the option on by default? Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: bolsh@xxxxxxxx