Re: [Gimp-developer] New thread on GIMP 1.3+

To: David Neary <dneary@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] New thread on GIMP 1.3+
From: Nathan Carl Summers <rock@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Gimp Developer List <gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Delivered-to: gimp-developer@scam.xcf.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: <20030619194401.GA6590@free.fr>
List-archive: </lists/gimp-developer>
List-help: <mailto:gimp-developer-request@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu?subject=help>
List-id: <gimp-developer.lists.xcf.berkeley.edu>
List-post: <mailto:gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer>, <mailto:gimp-developer-request@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer>, <mailto:gimp-developer-request@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu?subject=unsubscribe>

My vote is for 1.4.  Otherwise, the Slashdot headline we will get is "GIMP
2.0 Fails to Deliver Promised Features"

Rockwalrus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Gimp-developer] New thread on GIMP 1.3+
  - From: Sven Neumann

References:
- [Gimp-developer] New thread on GIMP 1.3+
  - From: David Neary