Hi, <pcg( Marc)@goof(A.).(Lehmann )com> writes: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20052 > > This bug report is rather outdated and supposedly fixed since MANY years. Now closed at your request. > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694 > > Same issue here. Same here. > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79751 > > Oops, this is certainly not something you told me about ever. I certainly did; I even added your email to the Cc: which should have caused bugzilla to send you an email about it. > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81791 > > This also is rather valid - I missed the change from overwriting > prefix to destdir. If you ever come around to fix this, will you please notice us about your change so we can avoid to have the bug-report open for some more years. > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104726 > > Well, this is another case of broken compilation environment (gcc doesn't > support the native asm syntax and compiler switches). Now closed as invalid. > Yes, it's not at all your duty to tell me about these - I am not at all > arguing about that, or wanting you to invest even more time and work. I'm sure you know how to query Bugzilla for the gimp-perl component of the gimp module. Salut, Sven PS: Thanks to the three bugs closed due to our little flame-war we are now down to rank 7 in the Bugzilla Hall of Shame (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/weekly-bug-summary.html). Thanks! :-)