On 10 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Nathan Carl Summers <rock@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > I hope that you didn't follow the current GIMP implementation too > > > close. It might have proven to work but it certainly has major > > > drawbacks and I wouldn't suggest it to application developers that > > > think about adding plug-in functionality. > > > > I've certainly made a lot of changes to make the design cleaner and more > > generic. I don't think that there are many of the drawbacks of the current > > gimp design left in libpdb. Of course, I'm open to suggestions and > > patches. > > the major drawback of the current design is that it doesn't use named > parameters. That is definitely one of the things we should change > right in the beginning of the next development cycle. Does your > library include this change already? Not yet. But I will put it on the TODO list. Rockwalrus
