Hi, Shlomi Fish <shlomif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > An alternative would > > be to distribute gimp-perl separately. In that case, I wouldn't care > > how it is built or packaged. > > > > Isn't it already the case for Gimp 1.3.x? no, the case for gimp-1.3 is that it ships w/o gimp-perl and there's no separate gimp-perl package. At the moment it looks a lot as if gimp-1.4 will not have gimp-perl support. Salut, Sven
