Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: Gimp is not consistently licensed]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2002 14:52:53 -0700, "Ben Gertzfield" <che@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Howdy GIMP folks.  Here are some points in the licensing of GIMP that 
> > need to be addressed. Specifically, there's a lot of code that requires 
> > that the authors be mentioned in the documentation, but there is no 
> > mention of them anywhere.
> 
> Hmmm...  This is bad, because this is not compatible with the GPL.  So we
> must either stop distributing these files or distribute them in a separate
> package that is not GPL'ed.

Why is giving credit to an author incompatible with the GPL? I
see no reason why an advertising clause need cause an issue...
could someone explain it to me?

Dave.

-- 
       David Neary,
    Marseille, France
  E-Mail: bolsh@xxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux