Raphael Quinet wrote: > > Also fair enough, though I'd consider prefixing these with exif- > > or similar to avoid polluting gimp-* forever. > > If I am still following you correctly, this means that all parts of > the EXIF data that should not be persistent Sorry, I wasn't clear -- I wasn't really saying anything either way about persistance, merely that some of the EXIF data is going to be of very general use and some isn't so the latter shouldn't be eating into our well-defined gimp-* namespace. --Adam -- Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ adam@xxxxxxxx http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3 But not us (no never) no not us (no never) We are far too young and clever
