Re: [Gimp-developer] How's CVS-HEAD?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

"Adam D. Moss" <adam@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is it pretty much definitely compilable and runnable by
> mortals right now (funtionality aside)?  What additions
> have there been to the list of **essential** build libs/components
> since 1.2.x?

yes, it should compile. As usual the files HACKING and INSTALL mention
the build requirements. In particular these are:

  autoconf >= 2.13
  automake >= 1.4
  libtool  >= 1.3.4

  pkg-config >= 0.7

  glib  >= 1.3.13
  pango >= 0.24  including FT2 support (freetype >= 2.0.1)
  atk   >= 0.10  (required by gtk+)
  gtk+  >= 1.3.13

Basically this boils down to a working GTK+-1.3.13 installation and
the usual autofoo tools.


Salut, Sven


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux