Re: [Gimp-developer] cubic interpolation vs. Genuine Fractals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Tino Schwarze wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:43:43AM -0800, larry@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > What does a Windows program like Genuine Fractals do that Gimp cubic
> > interpolation does not do, when I'm upscaling photographs for
> > printing to 8x10 and beyond?
>
> What are you expecting by upscaling pictures? Why do you do that? It
> will definitely not improve quality as there is no gain in information.

It might improve quality if you have some kind of printing mechanism
that upscales by pixel replication or something.  Then upscaling in
GIMP with bicubic interpolation might very well improve the quality
of the resulting image.  Agreed you cannot add useful information - but
having a fuzzy image is generally better than having a pixellated image.

----
Steve Baker                      (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail)
L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax)
Work: sjbaker@xxxxxxxx           http://www.link.com
Home: sjbaker1@xxxxxxxxxxx       http://www.sjbaker.org



[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux