On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Raphael Quinet wrote: > On Tue, 04 Dec 2001, Marc wrote: > > > ImageMagick has NO license. The only thing we say is: > [...] > > In any case, my version of ImageMagick (older, 5.3.6) does have a license > > (in Copyright.txt). > > > > (and I think it is very much BSD-like). > > Right. And I was wrong in my previous comment: the license is BSD-like > but without the advertising clause. So it is compatible with the GPL > and therefore the code could be re-used in the Gimp if necessary. (Although it *does* mean that ImageMagick had better not be using any GIMP code to help out it's decode/display of XCF's or it'll be in breach of GPL) ---- Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: sjbaker@xxxxxxxx http://www.link.com Home: sjbaker1@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sjbaker.org
