Hi all, Apologies - I accidentally took this off-list for a couple of mails. Returning to the list now. Cheers, Dave. Dave Neary wrote: > > Raphael Quinet wrote: > > Well, the easiest way to do that is to use one of the > > existing queries for open bugs and click on the "Sev" > > or "Pri" column headings in order to sort them by > > severity or priority. Then you can look at the first > > ones in each list and select those that appear to be > > the most important. There is no way to do this fully > > automatically because the priorities and severities > > are not always assigned in a consistent way (depends > > on who looks at the bugs and what they have in mind > > at that time). > > Hmmm... the idea I was trying to get at before was that > it would be useful to send a top 10 to the list, since > (as you no doubt know) the majority of developers haven't > been using zilla (including myself), and probably wouldn't > go regularly to one spot to check bugs. But if Mohammed > won't go to the mountain... > > By mailing the 10/15 most critical bugs on a monthly basis > to the list, I think people will be more likely to fix > them. I know that I was when Sven last posted his trawl > through outstanding bugs. It also has the benefit of > connecting the very useful bugzilla to the most commonly > used mailing list frequently, and getting people following > those links. I think that the mail aspect of this is > extremely important, and one message saying "there are > links to queries here (with a URL)" isn't enough to get > people using zilla in the long term (IMHO). > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Dave. > > -- > David Neary, E-Mail dave.neary@xxxxxxxxxx > Palamon Technologies Ltd. Phone +353-1-634-5059 -- David Neary, E-Mail dave.neary@xxxxxxxxxx Palamon Technologies Ltd. Phone +353-1-634-5059