Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> If the change is correct, it should of course go into 1.2 since it's
> a bugfix then.
Yes, bugfixes should go in. Cosmetical things should not go in; instead
of fixing a typo, say, you should provide an "overload" in en.po
resp. en_{GB,US}.po. It isn't necessary to provide also en_AU, en_CA,
etc. since English users in Australia are considered to use a cascading
mechanism:
LANGUAGE=en_AU:en_US
--
ke@xxxxxxx (work) / keichwa@xxxxxxx (home): |
http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)
