Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:57:50 +0100, "Adam D. Moss" <adam@xxxxxxxx> said:

>* What are pango and atk, and why do we suddenly require them (if
>indeed we do)?

>* Are there compelling advantages to using CVS-GTK which outweigh the
>cons of forcing developers and users to upgrade?  Is GTK 1.3 not
>backwardly compatible with the GTK 1.2 API?  My concern is that with
>such a casual-user oriented application as GIMP we can easily lose
>users by the wayside with each additional stipulation.

>* For those of us with pieces of the tree's core which diverge
>somewhat from the trunk, how much of a no-brainer is converting our
>code to GTK 1.3-isms?

I would add:

* are there Windows versions of pango and atk?
* do we reasonably expect Windows ports of the HEAD versions of all of
  these libraries before 1.4 is released?

Kelly


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux