Lourens Veen wrote: > [snip] > A solution if this turns out to be the case would be to enlarge the > bounding rectangle on all sides by the blur radius, or to simply count > pixels outside the bounding box as 128, 128, 128 as well. I just realised there's no 128,128,128 grey value involved ofcourse, it just takes the pixels from the rest of the image outside the selection. At any rate, I still think it should also take pixels outside of the bounding rect into account. Also a bit of an explanation for this weird post, this problem was posted on the GimpI gimp-art mailinglist, and I cross-posted my reply, that's why it starts halfway a thread. Lourens
