On Sun, 2001-03-04 at 11:57:03, Sven Neumann wrote: > Most lines of your patch only affect stuff that is broken if > G_DISABLE_CHECKS is defined (which happens very rarely). But you are Ahh, You're right, I compiled with both G_DISABLE_ASSERT and G_DISABLE_CHECKS defined. > It would have been nice if you had inserted the patch which would have > made it easier to comment it in a reply. In this case saving to disk and applying would be more complicated :-) > Yes, please. Would be nice if you could also merge the changes into the > HEAD branch. I've commited the patch to both branches. Zbigniew
