Re: RFC: unified system of "PaintObjects" (long)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 02:00:28PM +0000, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> On , 9 Feb 2001, Jens Lautenbacher wrote:
> 
> > Therefore I propose to completely rewrite everything that can be
> > considered a "PaintObject" into a generic provider form, where the
> > paintcore for each operation asks the provider for it's data.
> 
> It would be nice to be able to use loadable modules to implement new
> "providers", so that the first cut can ignore natural media, but then
> (eg Raph?) can add them later as a module.
> 
> Basically, make it a nice harness for the people playing with
> watercolour simulators etc to use. 

or painting on to other surfaces that are not flat (ie, 3d paint thingy)
or having a bump/displacement map "paint filter"...

just throwing ideas...


> Austin


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux