On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:03:42AM +0900, timecop@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides.
>
>
> Because
> a) my bandwidth is limited
You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
downloadign a normal diff.
> Therefore, downloading a 200k patch is a lot easier than getting a
> cvs-able gimp tree that I can update TODAY.
Why not generate a patch using rdiff -u or something like that?
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
