Austin Donnelly wrote: > Something like (dx*dx + dy*dy) > thresh might be a better condition, no? > Yes ;) Thank you. No one particular value of "Thresh" would please everybody, it would give rise to a "snap to an invisible grid" effect, so a setting mechanism for this value should extrude into preferences. Though for very precise positioning, one can resort to the "Move Tool" and cursor keys, and, perhaps dispense with a preference setting (for now) and retain a relatively large area threshold. I haven't tried this to see if it improves the situation. A matter for this coming weekend. Be good, be well Garry
