mitch@xxxxxxxx (2000-11-10 at 1243.23 +0100): > > > However exactly the same happened to me, which meant loss of half an hour > > > of work. I'll add a warning dialog just as the "chanes were made to %s. > > > really close?" one. > > Yes, it should ask if undoable "Reverting 'imagename' will lose all Sorry, I meant "non undoable". > > changes including undo stack" "Revert" "Cancel" (two lines + two > > buttons, the important part is the buttons labels). > > This is clearly a cool idea but it's also clearly a fat feature :( [...] > Maybe a good idea for 1.3... The undoable (without question then ;] ) revert would be cool indeed. Until it can be coded, I would like it to ask (that is easy coding, no?) and the docs show that is not undoable in this version, but maybe in next (aka check next version with a dummy image), and that opening another instance of the same image is a good solution too (cos you can save the first try or the second). GSR
