Nick Lamb wrote: > > We shouldn't, because it makes it very difficult to reach "a Gimp > developer" in reasonable time. #1 preference should be that someone > (you?) volunteer to receive unsubscribed mail, read it quickly and > forward anything approximately on-topic. #2 preference is what we > have now, spam goes to a savvy audience who hopefully never reply, > never show any sign of having received the mail. #3 is the worst case, > where we return unsubscribed mail as undeliverable, or refuse to > accept it if that's possible at scam... I'm usually at #2, but I couldn't help writing a humorous response to my first message. I was hoping everybody will read it and move on, but oh well... At least the spammer will (hopefully) get what s/he deserves. -- Brendan Byrd AKA SineSwiper (SineSwiper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Computer techie, Perl hacker, and all-purpose Internet guru Resonator Software (http://www.ResonatorSoft.com/)
