On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:53:54AM +0100, Nick Lamb <njl98r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 03:38:29PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > Ah! ;) Still gimp would not support uncommon errors by giving the user more > > freedom. > > Fine, I'll put the "PC vs Mac" option back into Gimp's TIFF filter and > mail you all the confused whining from users. :) I don't understand your whining reaction... you rally do not want the patch (for some reason nobody understands), so let's just cut this thread here... > Unfortunately what they come down to is that you can choose to make PS4 > do a lot worse than Gimp, or nearly as good. Since Gimp is already as > good as Gimp, having options to make it worse seems pointless, no? Could you point out the logic that supposedly was used to construct the above sentences? O yes, you are right, Gimp is always as good as Gimp, so there is no need to make it better, yes? -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |