Re: Performance of Gimp vs. photoshop for large images (fwd)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Jon Winters's letter:
> 
> I'm forwarding this from gimp-user for anyone who is not on that list.
> There was a question regarding performance and configuration but I can't
> seem to get Gimp to outperform Photoshop.
> 
> TIA for any configuration tweeks that may help me. (so far the only thing
> i've done is adjust the tile cache)

pretty strange. here a g3 notebook with gimp and tile cache set to 128Mb
outperforms a g4 with potoshop! but we are using extremely *BIG* psd files
(>200mb, 200 layers) and linux fs layer is much better than mac, right?

ciao,
federico

-- 
Federico Di Gregorio
MIXAD LIVE System Programmer                           fog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact        fog@xxxxxxxxxx
  99.99999999999999999999% still isn't 100% but sometimes suffice. -- Me


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux