> > He asked this very mailing list. [See attached] For just > one link. And while only Dr. Bunks can authoritatively > state the response he received, apparently it was zip. It was never my point to say that the situation is perfect as is. The only reason why I spoke up was that I wanted to speak for gimp.org. If there's a chance to get new people, new ideas, new spirit into gimp.org then the time is now. > Perhaps only the IRC is the proper forum for gimp administrivia... Sometimes it is, perhaps it shouldn't be. Everything can be changed... > On the other hand, perhaps this is why we really, truly need > a gimp.org webmistress/master - or a group that can make the role > function - so as to realize requests such as this. That is the > true issue. As any number of posters have observed, bits can > live anywhere - who cares where they live. Sourceforge. gimp.org. > Anyplace is fine by me. I do not at all insist on staying with the gimp.org server, but I'd really like to see a more uniform namespace. And I do agree wholeheartly with you that we need a group of people feeling responsible for gimp.org. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Received: by u2.farm.idt.net for gosgood(with pop daemon (v1.21 1997/08/10) Thu Apr 13 20:35:10 2000) > > <snipped...> > > What do folks think of adding either of these two resources to the Gimp? > > <Toolbox>/Xtns/Web Browser/Gimp-Savvy.com --> http://gimp-savvy.com/ > <Toolbox>/Xtns/Web Browser/Grokking the GIMP --> http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/ > I think it's a very good idea and as soon as those routers decide that I may reach cvs.gnome.org, I will commit this change. Sorry, that the mail was silently ignored in the first place. Sometimes it's hard to follow each and every mail on the list... Salut, Sven
