On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Sven Neumann wrote: > I also don't like the format of the localerc you proposed since it doesn't > look like the other files in ~/.gimp-1.1. Why not use the scheme-like > syntax people are used to use and that the gimp can parse anyway? I agree strongly with this... there are already too many different configuration styles; although I don't like scheme, it's consistent (and as sven says, there are libs to handle it already) > I'm not yet convinced that this goal is worth all the hassle. What do > other people on this list think about this? I think that the current quality of localization support could reasonably considered a 'bug'. (Replying in the negative here is my way of avoiding saying "me too" to the rest of this thread. Whoops, said it anyway...) --- Even if you can deceive people about a product through misleading statements, sooner or later the product will speak for itself. - Hajime Karatsu PS: please prune my address from your reply headers. I *DO* subscribe to this list.
