Re: the .po filename domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the
> current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel
> domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK.
> 
> On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a toplevel domain, but not
> for ukraine), however, the iso-3166 code for ukraine is ua.
> 
> So something seems wrong here. I *think* the easiest thing would be to
> standardize on iso-3166 and rename uk.po to ua.po.
> 

According to ABOUT-NLS from gnome-core:

   Internationalized packages have usually many `po/LL.po' files, where
   LL gives an ISO 639 two-letter code identifying the language. 

and that's what the one in the gimp source has to say:

   Language codes are *not* the same as the country codes given
   in ISO 3166.

And ISO 639 seems to specify:

   uk Ukrainian


BTW, I have no clue why there are different ABOUT-NLS in gnome-core and
gimp or which one is newer or more accurate. 


Salut, Sven

PS:
If you are looking for a good laugh, point your browser to the en_SV
translation for gnome-lookit. This is definitely a language that is not
defined in any ISO standard:

http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsblame.cgi?file=gnome-lokkit/po/en_SV.po&rev=1.1
&root=/cvs/gnome




[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux