Re: Performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 10:35:33AM -0600, Elan Feingold wrote:
> > Shouldn't we increase the default for the tile_cache_size? GIMP
> > was shipped with the default of 10MB years ago. Memory is cheap
> > nowadays and I guess we can expect the average user to have
> > more RAM available. I'd suggest setting it to 32MB.
> 
> Instead of guessing at fixed amounts, why not:
> 
> 	- Detect how much memory the user has.
> 	- Pick a reasonable default in terms of percentage (say, 50%).
> 	- Let the user change this default, also in terms of percentage.
> 
> That way, the default the Gimp ships with will work with all systems, and
> also on a given system if the user dumps more memory in, the Gimp will
> automagically have better performance.

I agree that magic numbers are foolish to use, but I do think that the
method for choosing a default should be carefully planned. Your system
sounds good, but the entire issue merits some discussion and possible
alternatives.

Zach
-- 
Zachary Beane       xach@xxxxxxxx
PGP mail welcome.   http://www.xach.com/pgpkey.txt


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux