Re: Re: Tile Cache Size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>I rather think _you_ are missing the point (which is disk layout and
>minimizing seeks, and _not_ a better memory layout. The tile based scheme
>leads itself naturally to spatial indexing, in fatc it's already half the
>way to go).

About HD: is there a way to do swap on demand to a partition? A daemon, lib
or something? I think that is what high end DBs do, handle their own data
physical space.

Just and idea based in what I have heard. Discard at will.

GSR
 



[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux