On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 05:12:02PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 08:43:48PM -0400, Zach Beane - MINT <xach@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > shortsighted. You never know who might be using something in a way you > > didn't think of. Err on the side of freedom next time. > > Many sliders in the gimp also have a rather limited range (brush size > max. 100 points for example). > > Just increasing the range is not sensible however. > > How about logarithmic sliders? These would allow us to increase the > dynamic range drastically while not loosing accuracy. The Ink tool could also be larger, think 300 DPI poster stuff :) Though it might be slow, but someone might have a Quad X3on 600MHz Ph3ar B0x for gimping or something (no, that is not me :) 20 pixels is pretty small (on 300 dpi that means 1.69 millimeters) Tuomas -- .---( t i g e r t @ g i m p . o r g )---. | some stuff at http://tigert.gimp.org/ | `---------------------------------------'
