On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 09:20:15PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 08:27:12AM +0300, Mircea Damian <dmircea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Suggestions? (I patched the source to use the above but I know this is not > > right because it breaks 5.005_03 users) > > This is indeed the wrong fix, the perl headers are expected to have a > define for that case. > > Since the devel-5.005_61 version of perl does indeed have that define, and > that this has changed from the snapshot before, I guess the perl headers > are not in sync with the binary. The perl that I have installed(compiled by me) perl_eval_pv is defined in embed.h under an #ifdef to eval_pv(there is also a comment about this renaming: #if !defined(PERL_CORE) && !defined(PERL_NOCOMPAT) && !defined(PERL_BINCOMPAT_5005) /* Compatibility for various misnamed functions. All functions in the API that begin with "perl_" (not "Perl_") take an explicit interpreter context pointer. The following are not like that, but since they had a "perl_" prefix in previous versions, we provide compatibility macros. */ For some reason I belive that one of those(PERL_CORE, PERL_NOCOMPAT, PERL_BINCOMPAT_5005) is defined so perl_eval_pv remains undefined. I'll try tonight to build gimp CVS again and I'll make some debugging on this. > > Since 5.005_61 is broken with respect to Carp.pm (and Gimp uses that > module), I'd suggest to use a stable version of perl (and yes, 5.005_50 to > 5.005_59 worked fine...) Just seen a few days ago 5.005_62 on CPAN. Does this version fixes the Carp.pm stuff? -- Mircea Damian E-mails: dmircea@xxxxxxxx, dmircea@xxxxxxxxx WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
