On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Olof S Kylander wrote: > Hello > > Well I know that all of us has a full load of work. I think Svens work is > nice!! (I.e lets go for it). As long as he also makes the anchor icon > which in it's present design sucks (no harm towards you Tigert but it is > clearly not one of your best icons ;-). Heh, no problem. I think it is a cute anchor :) Tig > > Cheeers Olof > > -- > > Olof Kylander Frozenriver Digital Design http://www.frozenriver.nu > > Consultant at Sigma nBiT > > Technical writer and coauthor of GUM (the Gimp User Manual) > > > > > On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Uh, Gimp users/developers are so conservative ... > > > > > I am not sure. Gimp is a drawing application and thus colors are important > > > part of the work being done. I kinda like the fact that the icons in the > > > gui are not colored. I dont know, what do others think? > > > > It wasn't the lack of colors that made me propose this change. It was the > > fact that the anchor and the trashcan we currently use do not fit at all > > with the other icons. Same applies for the Zoom_In and Zoom_out icons used > > in the Palette dialog. They do match however with the Gnome icons. > > > > So either we come up with a new set of icons, use the Gnome ones or we > > change the trashcan, the anchor and the zoom icons to simpler ones that > > match the rest. > > > > > Most of the icons in Freehand and Photoshop are B/W too.. I dont know if > > > it is good to mix color icons in _gimp_.. I know we have some in the prefs > > > dialog which I checked in, but I am not sure if we want to have a > > > color-iconified toolbar? Since that needs to be done too if we want to be > > > consistent.. > > > > I don't think the toolbox icons would have to be colored too, even if we > > use colored icons in other dialogs. > > > > > > Salut, Sven > > > > > > .---( t i g e r t @ g i m p . o r g )---. | some stuff at http://tigert.gimp.org/ | `---------------------------------------'
