Pat,
The conversion to compatible HTML went much faster than I imagined.
It looks like getting everybody comfortable with the tutorial is
going to be the longer part of the process.
I looked at the notes, if we need to make some changes we can, I
would rather not make a lot of changes if they aren't really
necessary though. Let me comment back about the notes, I am not sure
what to do about them at this point.
- 'the term "macro" in the tutorial' - Where in the tutorial was
it a problem, and what was the suggested alternative? The term
seemed pretty descriptive and non-proprietary, so I don't know
where the problem lies. Part of the wikipedia description of
macro is - "Macros are used to make a sequence of computing
instructions available to the programmer as a single program
statement, making the programming task less tedious and less
error-prone." I am not stuck on using the term but would need
to know what a better suggestion would be.
- 'have him look into
the DIR-SEPARATOR constant' - Again I really don't know what
problem we are try to fix, the suggestion isn't very specific.
I would say that it is the usual case that you can write a
more efficient program - 2nd version - using a 1st version as
a working model. I would actually be kind of surprised if
there weren't several places where reviewing the code and
productizing it produced code that is better from an aesthetic
and maintenance point of view. But, that is kind of missing
the point:
- This is an
Automation Tutorial. The efficiency from being able to edit
20 images in the time that it takes to edit one by hand.
- It is not a
programming tutorial nor is a rolled out change to Gimp. As
I pointed out in the text - I am not a programmer. The gimp
- python environment is not great for debugging and in the
past it was not robust. If the code is working I would not
be inclined to mess with it. You could waste a lot of time
by trying to get too cute with 'enhancements'.
- If there is a real
desire to productize the automation tools, I would be happy
to work on that effort, but I am not really that interested
in beautifying working code for a tutorial.
- I think all of the
Gimp Documentation should move to a Wiki. The biggest hole in
the documentation is topics not being covered and coverage
that is out of date. Lowering the threshold for people to
contribute would be a great way to address this. A Wiki seems
like it would allow for a larger amount of participation than
the current method of converting things to HTML by hand.
- My concern about
moving the tutorial to a Wiki site, is whether it would get
buried in a corner of the internet that no one can find. I
certainly have no idea where this wiki is. It would be a
shame to do the work of writing a tutorial and then put it
where no one sees it.
- I think a Wiki
format is great in that it can be kept current and follow
the changes of Gimp. As I said, I think all of the
documentation should be ported to a Wiki.
Anyway, if there are some
specific things that need to be fixed, let me know and we can
address them. I can be fairly flexible with changes, I just don't
want to get into a loop - modifying code until someone like it.
That has no real / specific goal.
If there is a documenation Wiki, let me know where to look, I
would like to see what is there so far.
Thanks for all of your help!
Stephen
On 2/20/2014 1:03 PM, Pat David wrote:
Stephen,
Just a couple of notes. There are some concerns about the
introduction of the term "macro" in the tutorial and the sense
with which it's used.
Also, saul
has asked me to relay to you: "have him look into the DIR-SEPARATOR
constant. Using it would obviate about half of his code."
If you can take a look at DIR-SEPARATOR to see
if perhaps it can help streamline things a bit, that would
be great. I'm also hoping others might be able to chime in
with other suggestions as well.
There is a consideration of moving this to the
wiki as opposed to wgo as well.
--
Stephen Kiel
26602 Strafford
Mission Viejo, CA 92692
Mobile/SMS (949) 702-1993
Home (949) 367-2915
snick.kiel@xxxxxxxxx
http://stephenkiel.blogspot.com/
|
_______________________________________________
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gimp-docs-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list