Roman and Pat,
I have made some progress toward getting my tutorial ready for release, but I am at a point now where I have hit a wall, and I would like to ask for some advice on how to proceed.
I did do a final edit of the tutorial, format it into xhtml, and add a couple of pictures. I downloaded a copy of Bluefish and used it to format the material into an xhtml file adding the boilerplate provided in the tutorial template by hand. It seemed to render well in the Firefox browser.
I did find a procedure for adding content through git web at https://wiki.gnome.org/Git/Developers and followed it as best as I could. I was able to clone the gimp-web, check out a branch, make local changes and commit them, but then my progress stopped. My questions are:
1) when I performed a 'git branch -r' several branches were listed. I guessed and picked HEAD as it appeared to link to origin/master. When I did a 'git status' and 'git commit -a' I got a warning message that “refname 'HEAD' is ambiguous”. Did I pick the wrong branch? Is there another problem, or is this warning normal?
2) The guidelines I was looking at seemed to be saying I could either use 'git-bz' or 'git push' to get my changes back to the main repository. Neither worked, so I was wondering which technique I should focus on. Would rather not debug them both at this time (could use quite a bit of time, since I don't know what either is trying to do).
The error message that I go with git-bz was:
> bash: git-bz: command not found...
The error message from git push –dry-run was:
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
A git pull –rebase right before trying the push seemed to find the repository and verify that my current branch is up to date.
I would appreciate any pointers you could give me. I am attaching a copy of the transcript from my shell session. I am also attaching a copy of the files I was trying to add & modify in case it is relevant or you would like to take a look at them.
In the mean time, I will start looking at git-bz in case that is the write way to go. It looks like there may be some setup issues, even though the error message make it look like it is an installation issue. The options for the bz command were not clear to me. The wiki page indicated the syntax should be:
git-bz file product/component HEADI am guessing the product should be 'gimp-web', but when I look at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=gimp-web I see the component listed as both gimp-web and www.gimp.org. Do you know which it should be, or whether it matters? When it asks for 'file' I am assuming it is looking for the results of the local 'commit'. In my case the feedback was
[HEAD a97ce5a] Added tutorial Automate Creation fo XCF from JPG"
Are they looking for a97ce5a as the file?
Thanks,
Stephen Kiel
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Roman Joost <romanofski@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Stephen,
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:37:33PM -0700, Stephen Kiel wrote:
> Roman,
>Not sure. I think these are remnants of old edits which have simply been
> I did browse through some of the tutorials & looked at they way they were
> marked up. I don't think porting my tutorials into a markup language will
> be any problem. The part that I don't really understand yet is whether
> there are tags that will or won't work right. In other words, if the XHTLM
> is well formed and presents in a web browser is there any downstream
> processing that looks at or uses particular tags? e.g. some of the xhtml
> that I looked at used the older <b> tags for bold instead of <strong>.
> Both work, one is more contemporary, but what I am wondering is whether
> there is a reason to use the older tag format.
updated for a new version of the website.
Usually you can send in your patches and they're been reviewed by people
> Once I do get ready to check out the module and add my tutorial, is there
> any kind of an approval process, or do I just stage the changes and commit
> them?
who have access to the module. The more you contribute, the more likely
maintainers see to getting you commit (read: push) rights.
Happy to help!
> Thanks for the feedback & help.
--
--
26602 Strafford
Mission Viejo, CA 92692
Mobile/SMS (949) 702-1993
Home (949) 367-2915
_______________________________________________ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
