On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:42:44PM +0200, Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote: > >2) I was in doubt if it was better adding a new "What's new with GIMP 2.8" > > leaving the old section renamed into "What was new with GIMP 2.6" but > > maybe is an overkill... > > > >Please _say_ what you _all_ think about it: > … > If the 2.6 documentation will be available in the future, there is > no reason to repeat it in the 2.8 version. In my opinion a "What's > new in 2.8" chapter will be enough. Perhaps two new chapters in > appendix A instead: "What's new in 2.6?" and "What's new in 2.8?" > would satisfy the curious user. Oh my! You are right! I just need to move the whats-new in the appendix history and change its name in history-26.xml ... -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ _______________________________________________ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
