On 27/10/2010 17:16, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote: > IMHO, whenever a text explains how to do something (here: how to > create a channel) it's definitely not a text for the glossary. I agree! > My current glossary entry reads: .... > Still not perfect, but it seems better than current situation. Reads pretty well to me :) > (I wonder if we should move the "Mask" entry of the glossary to the > Basic Concepts too.) The contents structure isn't quite right, is it? My view would be to have very simple Basic Concepts but link from there to, for example, sections 7 and 8 - where selections, layers etc ought to be more fully explained. So my hunch would be to put the 'mask' stuff in sections 7/8 too - it's not really a basic concept - it's a more advanced use of layers/selections. I have actually re-written some of the Basic Concepts - will share with you later - away for the weekend now. I've rewritten some of the selection mask stuff too. Another couple of ideas: In the Glossary it might help to link to the fuller descriptions? "Section 8: Combining Images" really needs to be renamed (using layers is not the only way to combine images, and text has little to do with combining images). I'd prefer it split - "Section 8: Layers", and then a new section "Section 9: Text". Of course everything below then has to be renumbered David _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
