Hi Andrew, On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:07:51AM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > I went to bugzilla, brought up a report, opened the corresponding XML > file, and the bug was fixed. I assume the bug was fixed because there > was a note in the header that stated that the file was changed to > accommodate that particular bug. On the other hand, the bug was still > listed as "not verified" and it had no comments. > > I only checked one bug, and at that point I stopped. I did not pursue > this to check dates (bad me). Which bug btw? > Is it worth my time to check bugzilla for documentation issues (since I > am working through the documentation)? Sure it is. You should assign the bug to yourself if you are work on one. I had one clash with Ulf in the past, where he was faster with fixing and pushing his changes than me :) > I should mention that I am impressed with how good the existing > documentation is. Cheers! -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanofski@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
